The Court’s opinion has reasonably provided a clear legal benchmark with respect to climate change related obligations.

Can the ICJ ruling force rich nations to pay for historical emissions? Ted Nordhaus and Anand Grover discuss the question in a conversation moderated by Kunal Shankar.

In a major move, the International Court of Justice has said countries must protect the environment and may be legally ...

The just-concluded 25th China-EU Summit, which coincided with the 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ...

Amid geopolitical turmoil, the top court reaffirmed states' legal duty to cut emissions. Read more at straitstimes.com. Read more at straitstimes.com.

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has advised that the level of climate finance given to developing countries must be compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5C ...

Negotiators will arrive in Geneva on August 5 to continue, and hopefully, conclude negotiations on the first global treaty to address the issues posed by plastics. This meeting is an extension of the ...

Climate scientists have urged the Climate Change Minister to not weaken the country's methane target, after a landmark ruling out of the UN's highest court.

PEV says the ICJ ruling reinforces that climate change is a human rights issue and that countries, especially major polluters, must act urgently to cut emissions and protect vulnerable communities.

Black communities brace for fallout after Trump revokes core safeguard that outlined pollution’s impact on nature and humans.