The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday to reverse a lower court's decision that said a South Carolina redistricting map was unconstitutional, rejecting the idea that it was racially discriminatory.
The Supreme Court upheld a pro-Republican South Carolina congressional ... to redraw its congressional map after groups argued it violated the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965.
By Matthew Cullen The Supreme Court’s conservative majority cleared the way today for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ... to challenge voting maps as racial ...
From The New York Times: The Supreme Court cleared the way on Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ... one against the expansion of voting rights and one ...
With state election deadlines approaching, a federal court in March had already ruled that South Carolina could use the contested map in this year’s election. The decision was 6-3 along ...
The case concerned a constitutional puzzle: how to distinguish the roles of race and partisanship in drawing voting ... Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a ...
The Supreme Court upheld a pro-Republican South Carolina congressional map Thursday ... such as to comply with statutes ensuring equal voting rights,” Kagan wrote. “Go ahead, though you ...
The Supreme Court allowed South Carolina to use a disputed voting map. The International Court of Justice will rule today on Israel’s invasion of Rafah. The U.S. government filed a lawsuit to “break ...