Type to search articles, cases, and authors. Press ↵ to view all results. The Trump administration on Wednesday reiterated its request for the Supreme Court to move quickly to block a ruling by a ...
Cynthia Fleming Crawford is senior policy counsel with Americans for Prosperity Foundation, focusing on regulatory issues, freedom of expression, and educational freedom. Prior to joining AFPF, Ms.
While congressional responses can come at any time and in reaction to various courts, the process should begin in earnest each summer at the end of the Supreme Court term. Congress should take stock ...
Public opinion polls fielded and released this summer showed a by-now-familiar partisan gap in views on the Supreme Court. Republicans are not only more likely than Democrats to approve of the way the ...
President Donald Trump celebrated the news that Justice Samuel Alito will be back for the Supreme Court’s 2026-27 term in a Monday night Truth Social post. “Great news for our Country!,” Trump wrote.
James Valvo is the chief policy counsel at Americans for Prosperity Foundation. In that role, he leads a team of attorneys advocating the organization’s policy interests through an amicus brief ...
Trump’s first attempt to end birthright citizenship came at the beginning of his second term, when he signed an executive order that prohibited children whose parents were either undocumented ...
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in November in disputes over (among other issues) a Catholic preschool’s challenge to its exclusion from a Colorado preschool program and an inmate’s ability ...
Type to search articles, cases, and authors. Press ↵ to view all results. Members of the public who want to attend oral arguments at the Supreme Court can now apply through an online lottery to obtain ...
In a profile of Chief Justice John Roberts, The New Yorker explored Roberts’ path to the Supreme Court and how he, as chief justice, is navigating the Trump era. “[I]t must be ...
Thirty-three years ago today, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was sworn-in.
The court analyzed the West Virginia law under equal protection as sex discrimination, not as gender identity discrimination. But the court departed from traditional principles that it had previously ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results