A Philadelphia judge on Wednesday dismissed a lawsuit filed against the city for banning rapid-fire gun devices known as “bump stocks” and “switches,” and lawyers for the plaintiffs quickly filed an ...

The agency estimated that as many as 520,000 bump stocks were sold between 2010 and 2018. Bump stocks replace a semi-automatic rifle's regular stock, the part of a gun that rests against the shoulder.

Two recent Supreme Court decisions present conflicting perspectives on “ghost guns.” ...

The Supreme Court agreed on Friday to decide whether a Trump-era ban on bump stocks, the gun attachments that allow semi-automatic weapons to fire rapidly like machine guns, violates federal law.

Consider that Stephen Paddock, at one point in the tower at Mandalay Bay, was able to fire 90 shots in a 10 second period using bump stocks. A machine gun can fire 98 shots in a seven second period.

Despite Justice Barrett's recent defense of judicial integrity, the Supreme Court's self-written ethics code proves unenforceable while justices continue to shape policy without accountability.

The Loper Bright ruling that ended so-called “Chevron deference” last June was described as a “return to judicial balance” — a technical correction. But its consequences are now impossible to ignore.