The appellate court opinion concluded that nothing in the record for either court found Ryan's clients' arguments were made in bad faith or without citation to legal authority.

"If upheld, (the statute) would allow the government to decide that a company may no longer own and publish the innovative and unique speech platform it created," the company's complaint states.

Three justices of the Connecticut Supreme Court said the majority overstepped and practically enacted a new statute, placing ...

According to U.S. District Judge Malachy E. Mannion, Bey plausibly pleaded he gave his employer fair warning of the conflict, ...