The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday to reverse a lower court's decision that said a South Carolina redistricting map was unconstitutional, rejecting the idea that it was racially discriminatory.
By Matthew Cullen The Supreme Court’s conservative majority cleared the way today for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ... to challenge voting maps as racial ...
The Supreme Court upheld a pro-Republican South Carolina congressional ... to redraw its congressional map after groups argued it violated the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965.
The conservative majority ruled the GOP-drawn map was not racial gerrymandering. The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a Republican-drawn South Carolina congressional district, reversing lower ...
President Joe Biden, a Democrat, said the ruling "undermines the basic principle that voting ... for one of South Carolina's seven U.S. House of Representatives districts. The new map increased ...
(Jeffrey Collins/AP) The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed South Carolina to use a congressional map that a lower court had said weakened Black voting rights, bolstering the political fortunes of ...
The case concerned a constitutional puzzle: how to distinguish the roles of race and partisanship in drawing voting ... Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ...
From The New York Times: The Supreme Court cleared the way on Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ... one against the expansion of voting rights and one ...
By a vote of 6-to-3, along ideological lines, the court upheld a redistricting map drawn by the South Carolina legislature ... and their voting patterns strongly correlate with race.