The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday to reverse a lower court's decision that said a South Carolina redistricting map was unconstitutional, rejecting the idea that it was racially discriminatory.
The Supreme Court upheld a pro-Republican South Carolina congressional ... to redraw its congressional map after groups argued it violated the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965.
From The New York Times: The Supreme Court cleared the way on Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ... one against the expansion of voting rights and one ...
Back in the U.S., the Supreme Court on Thursday approved a South Carolina congressional map that a lower court previously ruled was racially gerrymandered and constituted a “bleaching of African ...
The case concerned a constitutional puzzle: how to distinguish the roles of race and partisanship in drawing voting ... Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ...
(Jeffrey Collins/AP) The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed South Carolina to use a congressional map that a lower court had said weakened Black voting rights, bolstering the political fortunes of ...
By a vote of 6-to-3, along ideological lines, the court upheld a redistricting map drawn by the South Carolina legislature ... and their voting patterns strongly correlate with race.
A 62-year-old kindergarten teacher in Japan adopted the dog from an animal shelter in 2008, according to The Wall Street ...
With state election deadlines approaching, a federal court in March had already ruled that South Carolina could use the contested map in this year’s election. The decision was 6-3 along ...