The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday to reverse a lower court's decision that said a South Carolina redistricting map was unconstitutional, rejecting the idea that it was racially discriminatory.
Back in the U.S., the Supreme Court on Thursday approved a South Carolina congressional map that a lower court previously ruled was racially gerrymandered and constituted a “bleaching of African ...
The U.S. Supreme Court's current term includes major cases involving former President Donald Trump, abortion pill access, gun ...
From The New York Times: The Supreme Court cleared the way on Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ... one against the expansion of voting rights and one ...
The case concerned a constitutional puzzle: how to distinguish the roles of race and partisanship in drawing voting ... Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ...
(Jeffrey Collins/AP) The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed South Carolina to use a congressional map that a lower court had said weakened Black voting rights, bolstering the political fortunes of ...
By a vote of 6-to-3, along ideological lines, the court upheld a redistricting map drawn by the South Carolina legislature ... and their voting patterns strongly correlate with race.
After months of questions about whether there will be any presidential debates, all of a sudden, we have two high-stakes ...
By a vote of 6-to-3, along ideological lines, the court upheld a redistricting map drawn by the South Carolina legislature ... “When racial classifications in voting are the issue, the majority ...