By Matthew Cullen The Supreme Court’s conservative majority cleared the way today for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ... to challenge voting maps as racial ...
Back in the U.S., the Supreme Court on Thursday approved a South Carolina congressional map that a lower court previously ruled was racially gerrymandered and constituted a “bleaching of African ...
With state election deadlines approaching, a federal court in March had already ruled that South Carolina could use the contested map in this year’s election. The decision was 6-3 along ...
The case concerned a constitutional puzzle: how to distinguish the roles of race and partisanship in drawing voting ... Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ...
(Jeffrey Collins/AP) The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed South Carolina to use a congressional map that a lower court had said weakened Black voting rights, bolstering the political fortunes of ...
From The New York Times: The Supreme Court cleared the way on Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ... one against the expansion of voting rights and one ...
Reversing a dismissal just to make the plaintiffs try to meet an even tougher standard is nasty work for the high court.
(CNN) — The Supreme Court upheld a pro-Republican South Carolina congressional ... to redraw its congressional map after groups argued it violated the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Alito said the civil rights groups failed to produce any direct evidence finding that District 1 was drawn with a racial target and that the trial court’s findings show a connection between lawmakers’ ...