By Matthew Cullen The Supreme Court’s conservative majority cleared the way today for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ... to challenge voting maps as racial ...
From The New York Times: The Supreme Court cleared the way on Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ... one against the expansion of voting rights and one ...
The United States Supreme Court on Monday revived a previously ... the 2020 Census. South Carolina lawmakers said their goals ...
The case concerned a constitutional puzzle: how to distinguish the roles of race and partisanship in drawing voting ... Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ...
Back in the U.S., the Supreme Court on Thursday approved a South Carolina congressional map that a lower court previously ruled was racially gerrymandered and constituted a “bleaching of African ...
With state election deadlines approaching, a federal court in March had already ruled that South Carolina could use the contested map in this year’s election. The decision was 6-3 along ...
(Jeffrey Collins/AP) The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed South Carolina to use a congressional map that a lower court had said weakened Black voting rights, bolstering the political fortunes of ...
By a vote of 6-to-3, along ideological lines, the court upheld a redistricting map drawn by the South Carolina legislature ... “When racial classifications in voting are the issue, the majority ...
President Joe Biden, a Democrat, said the ruling "undermines the basic principle that voting ... for one of South Carolina's seven U.S. House of Representatives districts. The new map increased ...