The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday to reverse a lower court's decision that said a South Carolina redistricting map was unconstitutional, rejecting the idea that it was racially discriminatory.
By Matthew Cullen The Supreme Court’s conservative majority cleared the way today for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ... to challenge voting maps as racial ...
Back in the U.S., the Supreme Court on Thursday approved a South Carolina congressional map that a lower court previously ruled was racially gerrymandered and constituted a “bleaching of African ...
The conservative majority ruled the GOP-drawn map was not racial gerrymandering. The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a Republican-drawn South Carolina congressional district, reversing lower ...
With state election deadlines approaching, a federal court in March had already ruled that South Carolina could use the contested map in this year’s election. The decision was 6-3 along ...
(Jeffrey Collins/AP) The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed South Carolina to use a congressional map that a lower court had said weakened Black voting rights, bolstering the political fortunes of ...
From The New York Times: The Supreme Court cleared the way on Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ... one against the expansion of voting rights and one ...
The case concerned a constitutional puzzle: how to distinguish the roles of race and partisanship in drawing voting ... Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower ...
By a vote of 6-to-3, along ideological lines, the court upheld a redistricting map drawn by the South Carolina legislature ... “When racial classifications in voting are the issue, the majority ...